![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICOADS Web information page (Wednesday, 21-Nov-2007 17:56:37 UTC): UK Royal Navy (RN) WW II Logs and the Marine Data Bank (MDB)1. Introduction This webpage (plus Addendum) provides a collection of information about UK Royal Navy (RN) logbooks during the World War II period. This includes results that shed some light on the extent to which meteorological data from the logbooks were previously digitized into the UK Marine Data Bank (MDB)-and thus are already available in ICOADS. Two separate, and partially overlapping, logbook collections are available:
Possibly with the limited space on the card form as one factor, none of the instrumental metadata was keyed from the Met Logs into the MDB (nor was any ship name or other ID information keyed, as discussed in sec. 2). Based on a limited inspection in 2005 (i.e., of the six sample Met Logs described in sec. 3), Philip Brohan provided the following notes on the metadata and ancillary data types: "The barometer height and location are usually given, sometimes the thermometer height and location also-in a couple of cases details on the instrument source and calibration is given. There is also a set of standard instructions to observers inside each logbook. But the amount and quality varied dramatically even through this sample of 6 logs.Sec. 2 of this webpage describes the coverage during 1930-49 of the MDB data already in ICOADS, including the selected data digitized (possibly around the 1960s) from Met Logs into deck 204. Sec. 3 provides the results of comparisons between Ship's Logs for six sample voyages, and MDB deck 204 data that were reported at the same approximate locations. 2. Temporal and Spatial Distribution of MDB Decks for 1930-49 This section illustrates the spatial (Figures 2a-2t) and temporal (Figure 3, below) distribution of the MDB data (provided during 1998-2000 by Jim Arnott, UK Met Office, in LMR format) during the period 1930-49. These data were blended into the current ICOADS Release (originally as part of Release 1c, covering 1784-1949). However, these plots show the data coverage prior to blending, and thus before any duplicates have been removed. Table 1 lists the applicable decks. Figures 2a-2t highlight deck 204, which consists of data keyed from the Met Logs. UK Met Office (c. 1960s) describes series 4 (deck 204) as:
UK Met Office (c. 1960s) also provides the following information about Folio number (which, if available, might serve as a useful identification field in the absence of ship ID): "The number of the log in which the observations were recorded. For Series 5 these columns were not punched. The name of the ship making the observation was written on the back of the card. For data from Admiralty logs, both Series 4 and those included in Series 7, these columns were not punched, the log number being written on the back of the card." (Note: Very likely, the punched cards referred to were discarded many years ago.) Otherwise, the original card form contained no space for any ship ID information. Consequently, for the WW II period deck 204 (and 207) lacks any form of ship ID. This is an unfortunate omission, because it complicates the comparison of deck 204 with the overlapping Ship's Logs (as discussed in sec. 3) and can hamper later quality controls, e.g., by precluding track-checking based on the ID. Table 1: UK Met. Office MDB deck 201-8, 216 assignments (equivalent to MDB series numbers 1-8, 16). Descriptions and approximate time periods from overall MDB documentation (received separately from UK Met Office, c. 1960s; excerpted from Table 6b of LMR documentation). Additional MDB deck numbers in the range 209-255 refer to data outside the 1930-49 period, or non-UK ship (e.g., international exchange) data. Except for deck 216, actual time periods are shown to deviate to some extent, just based on data availability during the 1930-49 period, from those indicated in the overall MDB documentation. For example, no data whatsoever were located in this period for deck 208 (see also Figure 2).
|
3. Comparisons between the MDB and Ship's Logs
In this section, we show results from attempting to match MDB deck 204 (i.e., the existing digital version of the Met Logs; input LMR) with six sample Ship's Logs (Table 2).
Table 2. Sample Ship's Logs photographed (in color by Clive Wilkinson in 2005) for this comparison. Each Ship's Log covers one month, with the observations for each day recorded on a separate page (e.g., Figure 1a; Figures 1c-1d illustrate the cover and page following, which appear at the beginning of each Ship's Log).
|
Because deck 204 contains no ship ID information, data were extracted from deck 204 based simply on their temporal and spatial proximity to the Ship's Logs data. First, the recorded local noon positions were digitized from the sample Ship's Logs (some daily logbook pages lacked a recorded position, e.g., in port, and were omitted). Then all the local noon reports were extracted from deck 204 that fell within 10° of latitude and longitude of each Ship's Log position, yielding 61 extracted reports. No approximately matching reports from deck 204 were located for the Shropshire (which was in port for the entire month), so that ship was omitted from the following results.
For the five remaining voyages, Figures 4a-4e compare the spatial locations digitized from the Ship's Logs, with the 61 (approximately matching) noon positions extracted from deck 204. Note that in a number of cases, an approximately matching deck 204 report was not located.
Similarly, Figures 5a-5e compare the spatial locations digitized from the Ship's Logs, with the 61 noon positions extracted from deck 204. In this case, latitude and longitude are each plotted separately against day of the month, more clearly revealing differences in some cases between the positions from the two data sources.
Table 3 lists a selection of fields from the 61 extracted deck 204 reports, and provides access (via links) to the corresponding daily page from each Ship's Log. Based on preliminary comparisons between the fields from deck 204 as listed in Table 2, with the local noon reports from the corresponding Ship's Log pages, the meteorological fields from the two sources frequently appear to match up very poorly. However, a more detailed comparison of these 61 cases is planned.
RN94 provides several additional indications that the Ship's Logs and the Met Logs may be independent (or quasi-independent). As discussed in sec. 1, the Ship's Logs were reported by professional mariners with ship's instruments; whereas the Met Logs were recorded by Meteorological Officers with precision instruments.
In addition, as a further complication, it appears that the data in the Met Logs may sometimes be of mixed origin. An example Met Log page that is reproduced in Annex C2 of R94 includes the Remarks: "Entries marked with a red X are read and made by the Met Officer himself. The remainder are taken from the Met Log, and may not be very accurate. Barometer readings from the latter are entered to the nearest mb."
Table 3. The 61 local noon reports from deck 204, whose positions appear in Figures 4a-4e and 5a-5e. These fields represent a subset of the complete deck 204 report, and have been converted from the LMR format back into units closely resembling the form of data as recorded in the Ship's Logs (e.g., local hour, wind speed in Beaufort force, sea level pressure in both mb and inches, and temperatures in Fahrenheit). Each link in the table provides access to the corresponding Ship's Log photograph (All by courtesy of The National Archives, Kew (UK); TNA catalog references for the six voyages are listed below).
References
Rhodes, Martin H., 1994: Additional Marine Log Book Data, 1936-48. [UK Met Office report contracted (together with two accompanying reports covering 1856-99 and 1911-20) to examine the archives "to see whether all data had been transferred to the Marine Data Bank at the Meteorological Office."] (pdf, 4MB)
UK Met Office, c. 1960s: Reference Manual for Surface Marine Card Form 789 [Series 1-7; 1854-1953]. (pdf, 1.1MB)
UK Met Office, c. 1964: [Large untitled handwritten list of ships with Met Logs in the Met Office.] (pdf; 47MB)
[Documentation and Software][Links to additional]